Mapping Three Rivers Headwaters Nature Reserve (Updated)

Thursday, February 12, 2009


In May 2000, China declared the establishment of its largest nature reserve on the Tibetan Plateau: the San Jiang Yuan (Three Rivers Headwaters) National Nature Reserve (SNNR). Since then, China’s plans to protect the headwaters of the Yangtze (Drichu), Yellow (Machu) and Mekong (Zachu) rivers have received a lot of media attention. This recent BBC story, for example, highlights the relocation of '100,000 nomadic Tibetans.' However, there is very little information about the specifics of the plan in all of the published sources that I have come across. There isn't a single definitive map of SNNR. So I collaborated with some colleagues, who wish to remain anonymous, and prepared a new map of SNNR area using information compiled over the last few months. I am pleased to release the map here.



[Click on the image to view/download this (updated: Feb 20, 09) copyright free map]

This map is the most accurate and informative publicly available document of its kind on SNNR to date. It throws new light to the debates about SNNR and other nature reserves on the Tibetan Plateau. We have taken every possible step to ensure its accuracy, including crosschecks between different maps, reviews by experts who work in the region, and consultations with people from this region. Information we are currently doubtful are mentioned in a detailed description that should be used alongside with the map. There are no copyrights to the map, so please feel free to use it for educational purposes. We hope to produce better maps and reports on SNNR both in English and Tibetan languages in the future.



[Counties covered under the Three Rivers Headwaters Region. Maps are copyright free.]

To me, the establishment of SNNR and other nature reserve parks in Tibet raises many questions. According to a Chinese white paper on the environment of Tibet [Autonomous Region (TAR)], the government has established 70 nature reserve parks in the region between 1980 and 2003. The white paper states that 33.4% of TAR’s total land area is covered by nature reserves and that the government will increase the number and size of nature reserves in the region. So the first set of questions, leaving aside the rhetoric of conservation, pertains to the underlying economic and strategic purpose of establishing nature reserves in Tibet. What are the political and economic goals of establishing so many parks in Tibet?

The second set of questions concerns the politics behind scientific discourses of conservation and the relevance of "protected" parks in Tibet. Protection of mountains and grasslands from the nomads and their yaks? The ideas behind nature reserve parks that are applied in Tibet are based on Western ideas and approaches. How appropriate are these in Tibet? Why do governments and scientists continue to treat indigenous perspectives as irrelevant and unsophisticated into the 21st century? After all, these nomads and pastoralists have a proven capacity in maintaining the integrity of their local ecosystem. Their livelihoods depend on it and they have been living there for thousands of years!

I have pointed out elsewhere that the current top-down management approach of exclusion is unfit for nature reserve management in Tibet and developing countries in general. As Dr. Andreas Schild, the Director General of the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development has said in a recent interview that “Mountains without mountain people will be not sustainable.” Surely enough, Tibetan nomads and pastoralists who have been uprooted from their ancestral lands and made to live in concrete houses (see photos below) are facing serious economic and social problems that many have chosen to return to their traditional lifestyle.




[San Jiang Yuan resettlement housing blocks]

My final set of questions is about China’s commitment to environmental protection in relation to its development goals. Does the creation of nature reserves with new laws and regulations lead to environmental protection? How strong are China’s environmental laws? It appears that these laws exist mostly on paper and very little in practice. 

The Government has allowed several mining companies to operate in the "protected" area, including a Canadian company in one of the SNNR wetland conservation subarea of Chumarleb (Chu dMar Leb) county. The Three Rivers Headwaters area is also the site for a major river diversion project which involves construction of least three large dams (wall height of the dams are 175 meters, 295m, and 305m!) on the headwaters of the Yangtze and Yellow rivers, connected by a series of several hundred kilometres long tunnels through a mountain range that separate the two rivers.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Wow looks great. Very informative. I think you should download other Tibetan fonts, for the Tibetan writing which will look better.

Anonymous said...

Every time I look around your blog I find information that is expertly presented, extremely well researched and very well referenced. Brilliant.

Just a quick comment on the water diversion scheme briefly mentioned at the end of your post (which really should be a separate blog)

The report you link to, which details the dams to power the scheme, seems to have been written before the 1996 report referred to in it (or at least apparently without access to it). So despite the 2004 date on the webpage it clearly is not the most current thinking. Current thinking MAY be that it is not feasible technically, financially etc as has been stated by government spokespeople in 2006 etc but the problems the diversion project was designed to alleviate are very much still there.

BUT I would like to refer readers to the latest technology which is currently being rapidly expanded in China and other parts of the world. This is LVDC (long distance direct current) transmission or supergrids. You can find out much more about these from flicking through pages on wikipedia.

Basically for the first time this allows power to be transferred thousands of kms without great loss (maybe 5%). The old power cables (and by old I mean pre 2004 here) lost so much power in transmission that any power intensive project had to produce power reasonably locally. Hence the details of the dams planned to power the scheme are not too far away. BUT with LVDC the power could come from much further away and these dams become not project critical (though they could still be built anyway)

So supergrids are the core reason why so many dams are being built in Tibet as they make the export of electricity much more practical.

To what extent is Tibet supergridded ( probably not a recognised word but I believe simple enough to understand)?

As far as I can see from a quick flip around the web and a little bit of ground knowledge, certainly around the middle Yellow river and the string of dams south of Xining, probably between Lhasa and Tsetang and the Chinese town of Bayi near the Tsangpo bend and creeping up the valleys in Kham - the Ertan scheme and those on the Yangtse for example.

Supergrids are hailed as the potential core technology for the future as they would enable power from a solar farm in the Sahara to light up Europe or a vast wind farm in Inner Mongolia to replace China's coal stations but they also makes the dams in Tibet more valuable in providing power in eastern China,

At least that is my understanding of it.

If this is to be discussed then may I suggest a separate blog and that this comment is transferred to it (or absorbed in it - copyright free, no credit needed) as the principal issue of this actual blog is important enough and I have some other comments much more in line with the core issue.

regards

Stone Routes